One must separate two distinct ideas: 'intergenerational neutrality'—that a life 100 years from now is worth no less than a life today, so we should be equally concerned about future and present people—from the discounting of money, where a dollar today is genuinely worth more than a dollar in 2100; failing to discount money while honoring life-neutrality could itself harm future people by impoverishing the present and forgoing prosperity that yields human goods.
definitionpending
Speaker
Cass SunsteinEvidence Quote
“a life is a life and that there's reason for what I would call intergenerational neutrality in the sense that someone 100 years from now is not worth less in any large sense than someone now ... but we have to separate the idea of intergenerational neutrality which is good from the idea of treating a dollar today as worth no more than a dollar in 2100 which may be a really bad thing to do from the standpoint of people in 2100”
Created: 6/15/2026, 9:17:23 AM
My Notes
Loading notes...