Smith's China-earthquake passage, contrary to its common citation as evidence of pure selfishness, argues that what restrains a man from sacrificing a hundred million strangers to save his own little finger is not the feeble spark of benevolence but a stronger force—reason, principle, conscience, the man within the breast—and that what prompts genuinely noble acts is not love of mankind but love of what is honorable and noble in our own character, a deliberate inversion of the Wealth of Nations' butcher-baker passage.
causalpending
Speaker
Russ RobertsEvidence Quote
“It's a weird form of self-interest. It's we would not respect ourselves... we have this deep moral code within us that's produced by the feeling of of of the impartial spectator”
Source
Dan Klein on The Theory of Moral Sentiments, Episode 4--A Discussion of Part III 04/29/2009— EconTalkCreated: 6/15/2026, 9:36:51 AM
My Notes
Loading notes...