Institutional evolution lacks the selection mechanisms of markets and biology: there is mutation (variety of forms) but no mergers/acquisitions or natural selection pruning inferior institutions, so better institutions displace worse ones only in the very long run — Munger prefers Hume's view of accepted conventions over Hayek's efficiency-tending evolution.

causalpending

Speaker

Michael Munger

Evidence Quote

on that score I prefer Hume to Hayek there's a bunch of different ways of arranging societies and once you have conventions we accept them... but there aren't the same pressures that mean that better institutions are going to take over from worst institutions except in the very long run

Source

Mike Munger on Microfinance, Savings, and Poverty 04/18/2011EconTalk
Created: 6/17/2026, 10:29:24 AM

My Notes

Loading notes...